On Thu, 2007-01-11 at 09:00 +0100, Christophe Lombart wrote: > Furthermore, it is more interesting to access to different > content servers in the same time (even if there are all based on JCR). So, > I'm not sure the architecture could be simplify here. What do you think > about that ?
I thought one of the goals of JCR was to be _the_ common api for content repositories. Abstracting away JCR might seem rational to one developer, but for another it's a drawback. Does the persistence manager provide all the services that the JCR api provides, such as versioning, transaction, types properties, xpath and sql queries, etc? What about jackrabbit enhancements, such as node type registration etc? -- Torgeir Veimo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
