Hello, I don't know if it is a misconfiguration from my side, but I keep getting the 2.2.18-1 of the old graph-tool package. I ran apt-get update, added the new gpg key and uninstalled the previous version of the package. But the new python-graph-tool package cann't be found while the "older" is stuck at that version. I'm running Ubuntu and using the "precise" distribution.
Thanks in advance, Giuseppe 2013/1/6 Tiago de Paula Peixoto <[email protected]> > Hi, > > The modifications below were made to the graph-tool packages. I also > renamed the package to conform to the debian guidelines, and I also > made a package for python3. The package names are now > > python-graph-tool > python3-graph-tool > > Cheers, > Tiago > > On 01/05/2013 01:10 PM, Tiago de Paula Peixoto wrote: > > On 01/05/2013 01:06 AM, Johannes Schauer wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> I have some questions about the graph tool Debian package: > >> > >> Why does it depend on libboost-all-dev? Out of all ~38k binary packages > >> in Debian, only libfeel++-dev depends on libboost-all-dev. I dont see a > >> reason for the graph-tool package to depend on libboost-all-dev. Why > >> does it? > > > > This is clearly an overkill... The idea behind it was that the inline() > > function of graph-tool allows for on-the-fly compilation of C++ code, > > and I usually would use different parts of the boost library. This is > > also why other -dev packages and g++ are listed as run-time > > dependencies. > > > >> The graph-tool binary package also depends on expat. Why? The expat > >> package only ships the program /usr/bin/xmlwf which I dont see being > >> used by graph-tool at all? > > > > This is clearly an error. It should be libexpat1. > > > >> It also depends on python-dev. Why? Packages that are not *-dev packages > >> should not need to depend on python-dev. > >> > >> It also depends on the g++ package. The g++ package only ships the > >> binary /usr/bin/g++ which, as far as I can see, is never executed by > >> graph-tool? > > > > This is because of the inline() functionality, as explained above. > > > >> I'm just asking because once I try to install the graph-tool package, > >> apt-get tells me that it will fill 1036 MB of disk space with 323 new > >> packages it needs to resolve graph-tool's dependencies. This seems > >> somehow a bit like overkill to spend one gigabyte just to install > >> graph-tool? > > > > This is clearly excessive. I'll make the modifications such that only > > the bare minimum is required. If the user wants to use the inline() > > function, only then should the -dev packages be installed. > > > > Thanks for pointing this out. > > > > Cheers, > > Tiago > > > > > > > -- > Tiago de Paula Peixoto <[email protected]> > > > _______________________________________________ > graph-tool mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.skewed.de/mailman/listinfo/graph-tool > >
_______________________________________________ graph-tool mailing list [email protected] http://lists.skewed.de/mailman/listinfo/graph-tool
