On 05/14/2014 06:45 PM, [email protected] wrote: > Hi, > > I am trying to use the random_rewire function to generate a new > network, using the 'correlated' model. The network is pretty small > (208 vertices, 594 edges - no loops or parallel edges). If I just run > it with default parameters, it rejects about 300-400 of the moves and > 10000 iterations takes about 1 minute. To improve the shuffling a bit, > I tried to add persist=True. Now the problem is, after 2 hours, it has > not even completed a single iteration. I am suspecting that it is > stuck in an infinite loop somewhere, but I cannot figure out > why. Would there be any special property of a graph which causes this?
Yes, if you forbid parallel edges or self-loops, not all proposed edge rewires are possible (since they may generate parallel edges or self-loops). If you have persist=False, and if a move is not allowed, it is not made, and the algorithm moves to next edge. If you put persist=True it keeps trying until it succeeds, but you may get stuck in situations where all edge movements generate parallel edges or self-loops, which is what you are experiencing. The persist option is there because it is useful in some very specific circumstances. In the vast majority of cases, you should just use persist=False, and increase the value of "niter" until you achieve equilibration. Best, Tiago -- Tiago de Paula Peixoto <[email protected]>
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ graph-tool mailing list [email protected] http://lists.skewed.de/mailman/listinfo/graph-tool
