Yup, that would explain it. D is in the order of 10^5 in this case. Would I be able to write a more memory-efficient script manually with sparse matrices or is the underlying code already fairly optimised in this regard?
Best, Philipp -- View this message in context: http://main-discussion-list-for-the-graph-tool-project.982480.n3.nabble.com/Correlation-Histogram-Runs-out-of-RAM-tp4027010p4027023.html Sent from the Main discussion list for the graph-tool project mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ graph-tool mailing list [email protected] https://lists.skewed.de/mailman/listinfo/graph-tool
