Tiago Peixoto wrote >> 1) I would expect a tuple, not a list for each entry in the list. Is the >> manual wrong or is the code wrong? Or did I do something wrong? > > The point of the documentation was that two values for each step are > returned, not that the actual type was a tuple. Most code should not care > about this.
It is irrelevant to my code indeed. Seeing something different just threw me off. Tiago Peixoto wrote >> 2) Why am I receiving `nan` rather than a value for "iteration" as first >> entry of my list? > > I have no idea. I can't reproduce this. You have to send a complete > example > that shows the problem The graph file is 675 MB in size so probably not terribly amenable to sharing online. If I come across the issue with a smaller file I shall upload it. Tiago Peixoto wrote >> 3) Is there a particular reason why the length of the list is precisely >> 2000 >> in this case? (Obviously there is, I just haven't quite figured it out >> yet.) > > As stated in the documentation, this is a stochastic algorithm which will > stop after equilibration has been detected (using a record-breaking > heuristic). Hence, the length of the history will be different each time. OK, thank you for the explanation. Best wishes, Philipp -- View this message in context: http://main-discussion-list-for-the-graph-tool-project.982480.n3.nabble.com/Questions-about-output-of-history-of-graph-tool-inference-mcmc-equilibrate-tp4027027p4027033.html Sent from the Main discussion list for the graph-tool project mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ graph-tool mailing list [email protected] https://lists.skewed.de/mailman/listinfo/graph-tool
