Hi Guys, I understand your concern, and yes, 3D is not a panacea. But there are some studies that show when it is also displayed in 3D stereo path following tasks can be more efficient than in 2D. Not a universal thing, but some hints.
I think to a large extend it also depends on your display device. Just displaying a 3D model on a 2D screen is not going to be much better. My display device is a little different: http://assets. inarkansas.com/66594/ualr-vr2-110.JPG ;) But thanks for the answer! Dirk On Sat, May 27, 2017 at 6:13 AM, Tiago de Paula Peixoto <[email protected]> wrote: > On 27.05.2017 11:08, Peter Clarke wrote: > > I would say that it can be helpful when you can interactively 'fly > through' > > your data. It is possible to use a 'flying' interface with a game engine > > type backend to allow interactive exploration of massive datasets. > In my opinion that is the kind of thing you see in movies, but is hardly > useful in the real world. A network that looks like a huge hairball in 2D > will also look like a hairball in 3D. > > -- > Tiago de Paula Peixoto <[email protected]> > > > _______________________________________________ > graph-tool mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.skewed.de/mailman/listinfo/graph-tool > >
_______________________________________________ graph-tool mailing list [email protected] https://lists.skewed.de/mailman/listinfo/graph-tool
