Thank you, Tiago for the suggestions. On Sun, Oct 15, 2017 at 6:10 PM, Tiago de Paula Peixoto <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 15.10.2017 05:09, Snehal Shekatkar wrote: > > Thanks Alexandre for the reply. In some sense, it is true that gimp > doesn't > > deter the quality if I adjust the resolutions properly. My problem is > that > > when I include those plots in latex, the resulting plots in the output > pdf > > look really bad. I tried using higher edge_pen_width as well as putting a > > black hollow around the vertices but doesn't improve that much. > > There are many options available, e.g. you can join using inkscape, or much > more simply, you can just include several files in the same figure in > LaTeX. > > Using gimp is often a bad idea since it rasterizes the figure into a > bitmap, > where often it's best to preserve the image as a PDF, for example. > > In any case, you can find this sort of information in many other places, > and > is not really a good subject for this mailing list: http://bfy.tw/EU3S > > -- > Tiago de Paula Peixoto <[email protected]> > > > _______________________________________________ > graph-tool mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.skewed.de/mailman/listinfo/graph-tool > > -- Snehal M. Shekatkar Pune India
_______________________________________________ graph-tool mailing list [email protected] https://lists.skewed.de/mailman/listinfo/graph-tool
