So Emux does it mean that for now we should only integrate GHopper with MapsForge?
On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 12:46 PM, Emux <[email protected]> wrote: > GraphHopper being a routing library is independent of the map library we > may want to use it. > If works with Mapsforge and of course it can work with Java, Osmdroid, > Mapbox, web maps etc. > > The issue here is because of graph structure changes among GraphHopper > versions. > We usually need to use the same GraphHopper version for reading the graph > with the version that created them. > This isn't a strict rule, but something to have in mind if we come along > versions with graph structure changes. > > -- > Emux > Cruiser <http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cruiser> - Atlas > <http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Atlas_%28navigation_application%29> > > _______________________________________________ > GraphHopper mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/graphhopper > >
_______________________________________________ GraphHopper mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/graphhopper
