|
Hi Peter Not a limitation of graphhopper just of the fact that I haven't had the time to diagnose the simple fix fully. The way itn works instructions can be encoded part way down a roadlink so at that time the pillar would need promoting back to a tower. I hope to find time to look at it today. Sincerely Stuart Adam Sent from my BlackBerry® PlayBook™ www.blackberry.com From: "Peter" <[email protected]> To: "GraphHopper Java routing engine" <[email protected]> Sent: November 28, 2014 10:30 AM Subject: Re: [GraphHopper] Speed of OS ITN routing Hi Stuart,
thanks for the follow up! When I introduced the pillar node / tower node difference I got ~7 times faster code which makes your high numbers of ~30secs explainable. > This is an easy fix however does seem to break some of ITN's turning restrictions How do you mean that? Is that just hard to implement or do you see a GraphHopper limitation? Regards, Peter On 28.11.2014 11:19, Stuart Adam wrote:
|
_______________________________________________ GraphHopper mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/graphhopper
_______________________________________________ GraphHopper mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/graphhopper
_______________________________________________ GraphHopper mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/graphhopper
