Hi, I've been working with graphhopper for about 2 months now and I feel "tower" and "pillar" are pretty intuitive. IMHO, perhaps better documentation to show what they really mean would be way more useful.
Without looking at the documentation, I wouldn't know what "junction" and "geometry" nodes are either. Best, Thi On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 8:01 AM, Peter <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi all, > > as the naming is from 2 years ago I think it could be time to rename > 'tower' nodes into 'junction' nodes and 'pillar' nodes into 'geometry' > nodes. What do you think, would this be (more) intuitive? > > Below a quick documentation which I would add otherwise to the docs. > > Kind Regards, > Peter > > ** > From OpenStreetMap we fetch all nodes and create the routing graph but > only a minority of them are actual junctions, which are the ones we are > interested while routing. Those junction nodes I call tower nodes which > also have a graphhopper node ID associated, going from 0 to > graph.getNodes(). The helper nodes between the junctions I call 'pillar > nodes' which can be fetched via edgeIteratorState.fetchWayGeometry > > _______________________________________________ > GraphHopper mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/graphhopper >
_______________________________________________ GraphHopper mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/graphhopper
