Hi Peter, no, this one’s fine. That one is the problem: http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/265979343
Laurent On 8 févr. 2015, at 10:27, Peter <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Laurent, > > you mean that ferry line where motor_vehicle is allowed but railway=yes? > http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/31100827 > > Yeah it should not be excluded... > > Regards, > Peter > > On 07.02.2015 18:59, Laurent Bendel wrote: >> BTW, here’s another corner case I’ve come across: >> >> https://graphhopper.com/maps/?point=Nakhchivan%2C%20Azerbaijan&point=41.681118%2C44.862671&layer=MapQuest >> >> The problem is, there is a small way on the end of the ferry in Turkmenbasy >> that is tagged both as highway=tertiary and railway=rail. The test here: >> >> https://github.com/graphhopper/graphhopper/blob/master/core/src/main/java/com/graphhopper/routing/util/CarFlagEncoder.java#L204 >> >> doesn’t take this case in account. >> >> Now, it’s true that the ferry is transporting trains, and they may share the >> pier at some point (à la strassenbahn) but it may be more correct to >> represent the road and railways as two different ways rather than a single >> one. But instead of splitting hairs I could just as easily edit OSM and keep >> the test as is (according to overpass-turbo, there are a few other cases in >> other places, but it seems most of them are strict railways). What do you >> think ? >> >> Laurent >> >> > > > _______________________________________________ > GraphHopper mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/graphhopper _______________________________________________ GraphHopper mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/graphhopper
