Hi Peter, Thanks for your reply. I think we can add it to headers[21]. But nvm, not big deal.
*Best Regards,* *ZhiQiang ZHAO* On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 10:55 PM, Peter <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi John, > > yes, this is a bit waste of space :) > > But the empty space is to avoid thinking about header size in the > consuming class but mainly to avoid breaking the file format when we insert > new data there. > > Regards, > Peter > > > On 01.07.2015 02:04, John Zhao wrote: > > Hi, > > /** > * Writes some internal data into the beginning of the specified file. > */ > protected void writeHeader( RandomAccessFile file, long length, int > segmentSize ) throws IOException > { > file.seek(0); > file.writeUTF("GH*”*); // 4 bytes > file.writeLong(length); // 8 bytes > file.writeInt(segmentSize); // 4 bytes > for (int i = 0; i < header.length; i++) > { > file.writeInt(header[i]); > } > } > > it's totally 100 bytes. > We only use 96 bytes of them. > > It's not a problem. > Just curious. > > It's better to use them all, to reduce any further question. :) > > *Best Regards,* > *ZhiQiang ZHAO* > > > _______________________________________________ > GraphHopper mailing > [email protected]https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/graphhopper > > > > _______________________________________________ > GraphHopper mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/graphhopper > >
_______________________________________________ GraphHopper mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/graphhopper
