Hi John, sorry, I do not understand your problem or question here. Would you describe it again step by step for me :) ?
Kind Regards, Peter On 27.07.2015 21:45, John Zhao wrote: > Hi Peter, > > Thanks. > Actually I only have 1 flagEncoder in the EncodingManager. > The call is exact same, preparation.findSubnetworks() > preparation.findSubnetworks() using edgeFilter which is also from > singleEncoder. > > *Best Regards,* > *ZhiQiang ZHAO* > > On Sun, Jul 26, 2015 at 7:56 AM, Peter <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > Hi John, > > it should not be related to calling these method twice. It is just > one time where you calculate the subnetworks independent of any > FlagEncoder or direction via findSubnetworks and the second pass > is FlagEncoder- and access-dependent via > removeDeadEndUnvisitedNetworks. > > Regards, > Peter > > > On 24.07.2015 21:16, John Zhao wrote: >> Hi Peter, >> >> I am still confused. >> at first we call >> map = findSubnetworks(); >> >> after the cleanup, we call the same method in Graphhopper. >> int remainingSubnetworks = preparation.findSubnetworks().size(); >> Why the subnetwork was recognized the latter time, but not the first >> time? >> we remove some edges make it not connected? >> >> *Best Regards,* >> *ZhiQiang ZHAO* >> >> On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 2:22 PM, Peter <[email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> >> >> Hi ZhiQiang, >> >> yes, according to the wiki this is wrongly mapped: >> /Avoid tagging highway intersections as that does not make >> clear which way has the impediment. / >> >> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:barrier%3Dgate >> >> Peter >> >> >> On 23.07.2015 23:16, John Zhao wrote: >>> Hi Peter, >>> >>> Maybe the following one related >>> with >>> https://github.com/graphhopper/graphhopper/issues/388#issuecomment-88066385 >>> >>> I have a look at 37.32611992939085,-121.9961998312816. >>> It seesm related with barrier=gate at intersection. >>> http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1126492194 >>> >>> *Best Regards,* >>> *ZhiQiang ZHAO* >>> >>> On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 2:11 PM, Peter <[email protected] >>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >>> >>> >>> There are two types of subnetworks and the smaller ones >>> seems to be 'one-way subnetworks' which means they are >>> eg. only reachable as destination or start. But if you >>> would start from a destination-only subnetwork you'll >>> get 'not found' for all points outside of this network. >>> >>> Regards, >>> Peter >>> >>> >>> On 23.07.2015 23:03, John Zhao wrote: >>>> Interesting, >>>> when I increase minOnewayNetworkSize from 20 to 50, the >>>> following two disappeared. >>>> subnetwork start from: >>>> 37.32611992939085,-121.9961998312816 size: 24 >>>> subnetwork start from: >>>> 37.78373608999855,-122.25065187925067 size: 34 >>>> >>>> *Best Regards,* >>>> *ZhiQiang ZHAO* >>>> >>>> On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 1:55 PM, John Zhao >>>> <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> I tried car flag encoder with following parameter >>>> on San Francisco bay area data from mapzen. >>>> >>>> https://s3.amazonaws.com/metro-extracts.mapzen.com/san-francisco-bay_california.osm.pbf >>>> >>>> minNetworkSize=200 >>>> minOnewayNetworkSize=20 >>>> >>>> I printed all the remaining subnetworks. >>>> edges: 591932, nodes 437420, there were 3496 >>>> subnetworks. removed them => 13121 less nodes. >>>> Remaining subnetworks:5 >>>> The remaining subnetworks are: >>>> subnetwork start from: >>>> 37.32611992939085,-121.9961998312816 size: 24 >>>> subnetwork start from: >>>> 37.56018439442332,-122.30257814308803 size: 436637 >>>> subnetwork start from: >>>> 37.78373608999855,-122.25065187925067 size: 34 >>>> subnetwork start from: >>>> 38.180185962770565,-121.70631393878864 size: 301 >>>> subnetwork start from: >>>> 37.85717050411933,-122.07633641532816 size: 424 >>>> >>>> I don't understand why there is still subnetwork >>>> less than 200 nodes. >>>> >>>> I have a look at 37.32611992939085,-121.9961998312816. >>>> It seesm related with barrier=gate at intersection. >>>> http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1126492194 >>>> >>>> *Best Regards,* >>>> *ZhiQiang ZHAO* >>>> >>>> > > > _______________________________________________ > GraphHopper mailing list > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/graphhopper > > > > > _______________________________________________ > GraphHopper mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/graphhopper
_______________________________________________ GraphHopper mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/graphhopper
