Question #260936 on Graphite changed: https://answers.launchpad.net/graphite/+question/260936
Description changed to: Hi guys, I want to run monitoring stack based on collectd+carbon+rabbitmq however I have few questions. I will be pulling quite a lot of metrics about 500hosts to monitor with interval of 1 minute (some important metrics will be collected more often, not less than 10secs) so I assume about 200k metrics/minute. Do I need multiple carbon caches to handle this amount of traffic? Or a single carbon cache should be enough? Second question is about RabbitMQ. By default carbon creates exclusive queues - I want to use rabbit for zero downtime - when server with carbon will die rabbitmq will be collecting the metrics. But when carbon disconnects, the exclusive queue dissapears. Why by defualt carbon creates exclusive queue? I can possibly change the code of the amqp section in carbon .py files but is it a good idea? There were also performance problems with txamqp plugin in earlier version of carbon, are those problems still occuring? And is the pickle protocol still best option for scalability? -- You received this question notification because you are a member of graphite-dev, which is an answer contact for Graphite. _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~graphite-dev Post to : graphite-dev@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~graphite-dev More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
