On Friday 17 August 2007 02:21, Paul Kelly wrote: > On Fri, 17 Aug 2007, Helena Mitasova wrote: > > [Interesting/impressive test results...] > > > which brings me to the main question - are there any objections to make > > dmax default value > > as large as the region to make sure that it does not add any points > > (currently it is set to 1.25 resolution value which is obviously not > > enough)? I have been trying to eliminate this parameter for years > > as it usually causes more problems than it solves. > > For 7.x perhaps you could drop both the dmin and dmax parameters, and add > a note to the man page suggesting that the user preprocess their contour > data with v.generalize to resolve issues with closely-spaced points, > before running v.surf.rst? > > Just a thought > > Paul
Helena: Very interesting results- maybe consider writing this up in the OSGEO journal ? I agree with Paul, as I have struggled and fussed with those two options for v.surf.rst for years. Cheers, Dylan > > _______________________________________________ > grass-dev mailing list > grass-dev@grass.itc.it > http://grass.itc.it/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev -- Dylan Beaudette Soils and Biogeochemistry Graduate Group University of California at Davis 530.754.7341 _______________________________________________ grass-dev mailing list grass-dev@grass.itc.it http://grass.itc.it/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
