HI all,
I'm not an expert of those system.
But looking at the Markus resume, I suppose that OSGeo can offer a lot
of advantages.
Moreover I also like the idea to be on the side of other OSGeo project.
Maxi
Frank Warmerdam wrote:
Dylan Beaudette wrote:
I vote +1 (?) for moving to SVN as hosted by OSGeo.org. After
spending some time with Trac on my own projects I have really come to
like it. Furthermore, integration with the rest of OSGeo would be a
good thing. Having the source code next to projects like GDAL,
Mapserver, etc. might even entice some new developers into the GRASS
community.
Dylan,
I'll second the benefits of Trac coupled with Subversion! I was a bit of
a sceptic a year ago, figure it would be just another bug system, and
just another source control system but they have individually improved
the GDAL project, and the integration between them has been the icing on
the cake. For instance, the ease with which tickets (bugs) can refer to
source control changesets and the "timeline" page showing commits, ticket
updates (and wiki changes).
All that aside, I think there are social and shared support benefits to
a common infrastructure, and I'd love to see GRASS at OSGeo but those are
softer points, and I'm obviously biased. :-)
Best regards,
begin:vcard
fn:Massimiliano Cannata
n:Cannata;Massimiliano
org:SUPSI - Scuola Universitaria Professionale della SVizzera Italiana;Istituto Scienze della Terra
adr:;;Trevano;Canobbio;;CP 72;Switzerland
email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
title:Responsabile area geomatica
tel;work:+41 (0)58 666 62 14
tel;fax:+41 (0)58 666 62 09
url:http://istgis.ist.supsi.ch/geomatica/index.php
version:2.1
end:vcard
_______________________________________________
grass-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://grass.itc.it/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
