It would be certainly nice to know why, if you like to dig deeper have a look at thread [GRASS-dev] [grass-code I][431] g.copy segmentation fault ( http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg00359.html )

Volker

Maris Nartiss wrote:

It may be not a GRASS issue, but it would be nice to know why it
happens, as, probably, there are some tricks to disable THIS
optimization in GRASS. Like adding some *magic* in code or tests in
autoconf part to disable optimization if system is FOO.

Just 0.002$,
Maris.

2007/9/27, Volker Wichmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
We did a lot of tests back then, and it seems to be a problem with the
compiler optimisation code. This issue isn't fixed, but you can work
around it by re-compiling g.copy without optimisation enabled (see
thread below). I don't think it is a GRASS issue.

Volker

_______________________________________________
grass-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://grass.itc.it/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev

Reply via email to