Michael Barton wrote: > Also, in both cases the interpolation does not respect a MASK.
It is not expected to. The MASK is put into action only when *reading* a raster map, not when creating/writing one. e.g. r.mapcalc MASK=fields r.mapcalc one=1 g.remove MASK r.univar one # look, no NULL cells r.mapcalc MASK=fields r.mapcalc one_masked=one g.remove MASK r.univar one_masked # lots of null cells, as the "one" map was masked while being read If you don't remove MASK, r.univar (libgis) adds in nulls when it reads the maps. Hamish __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com _______________________________________________ grass-dev mailing list grass-dev@grass.itc.it http://grass.itc.it/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
