Eric: >> If the goal is to use a uniform documentation style, we should probably >> figure out >> which headings are going to be accepted. I know it's not the most pressing >> issue, but a common style could save a lot of work in re-writes in the >> future.
Hamish: >Auto-generated (usually) >======================== ><H2>NAME</H2> ><H2>KEYWORDS</H2> ><H2>SYNOPSIS</H2> > >* = Required >! = Suggested >. = Optional > >In recommended order >-------------------- > >* <H2>DESCRIPTION</H2> >! <H2>NOTE</H2>, <H2>NOTES</H2> >! <H2>EXAMPLE</H2>, <H2>EXAMPLES</H2> >. <H2>TODO</H2> >. <H2>BUGS</H2> >. <H2>REFERENCE</H2>, <H2>REFERENCES</H2> >* <H2>SEE ALSO</H2> >* <H2>AUTHOR</H2>, <H2>AUTHORS</H2> > >more in this added to the wiki page: >http://grass.gdf-hannover.de/wiki/Updating_GRASS_Documentation > > >Hamish Thanks for the feedback. This will form a good base to build on. The wiki page is much improved, too! ~ Eric. _______________________________________________ grass-dev mailing list grass-dev@grass.itc.it http://grass.itc.it/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
