On Thursday 15 November 2007, Maciej Sieczka wrote: > Massimiliano Cannata wrote: > > +1 > > I think it would be really useful and standardize the inputs for vector > > commands. > > +1 > > > I agrre that if one want to merge cat and where he can add in the where > > clause. > > At this point is cats necessary? > > Yes. If the vector has no table, the features can still have > categories (they usually do). > > Maciek
This is a good point. I am all for standardizing... however Hamish's qualms are an important issue. We should come up with an organized approach to testing and re-testing these large-scale changes so that we aren't faced with a pile of non-working but standardized modules. This brings up a related topic: a complete GRASS test suite. I know that Soren (?) had something like this going -- however work on the test suite might be of higher importance than features. Thoughts? Dylan -- Dylan Beaudette Soil Resource Laboratory http://casoilresource.lawr.ucdavis.edu/ University of California at Davis 530.754.7341 _______________________________________________ grass-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
