Hi, 2007/12/7, Glynn Clements <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I'm unclear on how further 6.x development is to be handled. > > In the medium term, I would expect there to be futher development on > 6.x culminating in a 6.4 release. This will need to occur on a > separate branch to 7.x. E.g.: > > +----+----> 7.x-devel > | > +----+----+--------> 6.x-devel > | | > | +----> 6.4-release > | > +----> 6.3-release > proposal... +--+-----+-----> 7.x-devel (trunk) | | | | | +------> 6.4-release (branch) <--- should be created as soon as possible | | | | | | backports (6.4 -> 6.3) | | | | +-------------> 6.3-release (branch) Martin > The 6.x-devel and 6.3-release branches would be created immediately, > with 6.4-release created once 6.x-devel has accumulated changes which > cannot go into the 6.3.x releases. > > The trunk would become 7.x-devel, and would quickly change to the > point that merging changes with 6.x-devel would become impractical. > > -- > Glynn Clements <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > -- Martin Landa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * http://gama.fsv.cvut.cz/~landa * _______________________________________________ grass-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
