>>>>> Markus Neteler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
>> It's probably reasonable to require a Shell implementation with
>> either once you're depending on Shell functions being available.
>> I'm not sure that these constructs are mandated by any standard,
>> though.
>> The `test' (`[ ... ]') command should be generally available as
>> well. IIRC, it's mandated by POSIX.
>> [...]
> I would leave this to others - I am not much expert of POSIX.
On the other hand, the change to use just one `sed' invocation
is probably worth applying anyway.
>>> I do agree that the raster part needs a radical renovation. Some
>>> team members also have ideas here - hope it comes true for GRASS
>>> 7.
>> Are these collected anywhere on the Web (besides of [1, 2])?
>> [1] http://grass.gdf-hannover.de/wiki/GRASS_7_ideas_collection
>> [2] http://grass.gdf-hannover.de/wiki/Replacement_raster_format
> AFAIK some material was collected in the Wiki from mailing list
> discussions: http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/grass-dev/
> More is scattered around in the list archive. (use e.g.
> http://www.nabble.com/forum/Search.jtp?query=raster+format&sort=date&local=y&forum=1200
> to find more).
ACK. Thanks.
_______________________________________________
grass-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
