Michael, 2008/1/17, Michael Barton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Shouldn't this be changed? I thought that the wxpython files were > going to move into the 6.3 branch with the move to the SVN and not > wait until 6.4. This will allow more people to actively test and > improve the new GUI. The files may be *copied* from trunk to releasebranch_6_3 before 6.3.0 will be released (in 2 weeks). For wxGUI development should be used trunk (or devel grass6 branch after it will be created, not releasebranch_6_3). I am not sure about copying files from trunk to releasebranch_6_3, since it would be nice to avoid backporting issue... Martin > > Michael > ______________________________ > Michael Barton, Professor > Professor of Anthropology > Director of Graduate Studies > School of Human Diversity & Social Change > Center for Social Dynamics & Complexity > Arizona State University > Tempe, AZ 85287-2402 > USA > > voice: 480-965-6262; fax: 480-965-7671 > www: http://www.public.asu.edu/~cmbarton > > On Jan 16, 2008, at 4:38 PM, Moritz Lennert wrote: > > > On Thu, January 17, 2008 00:28, Michael Barton wrote: > >> Nikos, > >> > >> These are in the trunk. I'm not sure why they are not in 6.3.0RC4. > > > > As Martin mentioned, the 6.3 branch contains outdated files. See > > http://trac.osgeo.org/grass/browser/grass/branches/releasebranch_6_3/gui/wxpython > > which do not lead to the installation of wxgrass. > > > > Moritz > > > > _______________________________________________ > grass-user mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-user > -- Martin Landa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * http://gama.fsv.cvut.cz/~landa * _______________________________________________ grass-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
