Dylan Beaudette wrote: > > However-- this is starting to get into the realm of feature > > bloat... > > As neat as it would be to have R routines which could work directly > > on GRASS data structures, it might be overkill considering the > > possible amount of work. I'll keep checking around and post back > > other ideas.
Well, people always seems to ask about kriging because they've heard of it. http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/grass-user/2004-May/025709.html (see s.surf.krig in GRASS 5 and v.surf.krige on the wiki addons page) > > On the other hand-- R has so many great plotting / analysis > > routines, it would be a shame to re-implement these in GRASS if > > they could be easily "plugged-into" via some kind of share library > > / SWIG interface. Yup, it would be nice to be able to provide modules with R as the backend versus writing/maintaining something new ourselves. Hamish ____________________________________________________________________________________ Looking for last minute shopping deals? Find them fast with Yahoo! Search. http://tools.search.yahoo.com/newsearch/category.php?category=shopping _______________________________________________ grass-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
