On Feb 16, 2008, at 4:16 PM, Hamish wrote:
Martin:
anyway usage of wxPseudoDC class can causes problems during
compilation process. If we don't find reasonably good approach I will
take a look how to eliminate wxPseudoDC in vdigit C++ code (use wxDC
instead). I would prefer to use wxPseudoDC.
wx 3.0 is due out soon* so a solution is already in the pipeline and
will arrive before we /really/ need it (6.4.0).
The new GUI is clearly indicated as a work in progress- we can put in
the announcement that users who want to try wxGUI should study the
README file and expect some bumps. The work-around for wx2.8 is just a
one liner not some major recompile or installation.
Thus for my 2c, if you prefer to use wxPseudoDC then stay with it, and
focus on the long term goal of 6.4.0. Why sacrifice your valuable
energy & a better code-path to get around short term (small) problems
which are already fixed upstream?
Seems reasonable to me.
Michael
[*]
http://wxwidgets.blogspot.com/2007/11/looking-forward-to-
wxwidgets-3.html
Hamish
______________________________________________________________________
______________
Never miss a thing. Make Yahoo your home page.
http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs
_______________________________________________
grass-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
