Markus, Changeset 30450 should have been identical to changeset 30449; the only change I intended to make was to improve the wording of the warning message in trunk/raster/r.out.gdal/main.c line 323 and 328; the backport to grass63_branch should have had only these two changes. I don't know how all those other diffs found their way in the commit, as I have never edited any other source code in that file. So changeset 30450 should be reverted.
~ Eric. -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Markus Neteler Sent: Tue 3/4/2008 6:13 PM To: Patton, Eric Cc: [email protected] Subject: Re: [GRASS-dev] Update to r.out.gdal Eric, please tell us the commit(s) from http://trac.osgeo.org/grass/timeline to better understand it. Markus On Mon, Mar 3, 2008 at 7:11 PM, Patton, Eric <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >Hi, I just committed a warning message change in TRUNK, but I think some > >un-backported changes were also committed to grass63_release inadvertently > >during my commit. > > > >Can someone confirm that everything is ok? Sorry for the headache. > > I think I failed to sync my grass63_release source with the svn repo before > committing. My submission incorporates Martin's edits from changeset 29556 as > well, if I'm not mistaken. > > What's the proper svn magic for cases like these? > > > > ~ Eric. > > > _______________________________________________ > grass-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev > -- Open Source Geospatial Foundation http://www.osgeo.org/ http://www.grassbook.org/ _______________________________________________ grass-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
