On Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 9:54 PM, Glynn Clements <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Markus Neteler wrote: > > > > [please respond in trac, grass-dev cannot post to trac] > > > > > > Actually, I'd really prefer it if we could keep discussions on the > > > mailing list. trac can be updated when issues get resolved. > > > > > > The issue is (here) that eg Even Rouault (GDAL developer) who responded > to > > the DBF ticket AFAIK does not read the grass-dev list, > > There is an archive: > http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/grass-dev/ I know, I have maintained it for 10 years meanwhile. The point is that non-subscribers won't detect postings there without being pointed to them. > <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/grass-dev/> > likewise FrankW likely > prefers tickets over scattered discussion in our archive. > We cannot expect people like him who follow 10+ projects in parallel to voluntarily scan our archive. > Would it be possible for trac to automatically add a link for the > mailing-list thread to the ticket? In theory yes: http://trac-hacks.org/wiki/EmailtoTracScript So far, I could not convince Frank to install it. > > > Right now, my grass-dev folder consists mostly of posts by "GRASS > > > GIS", with no threading. > > > > > > We can rename it to "GRASS trac" easily (in Admin). Makes more sense. > > > The point is that it doesn't tell you who actually posted the message. > This makes it awkward to find a particular message in a long thread. OK, now I get the point. We have to check http://trac-hacks.org/wiki/macro http://trac-hacks.org/wiki/patch http://trac-hacks.org/wiki/plugin for a solution. We may not be the first to have this wish. > > For me threading works. The headers contain the relevant tags: > > All responses are treated as replies to the original report, rather > than as a reply to a specific message OK, the same need to check trac modifications for a solution. Markus
_______________________________________________ grass-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
