On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 6:28 AM, Hamish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Markus Neteler wrote: > > (to continue on this thread) > > > > After 6 release candidates, even tested on MS-Windows, > > I don't see any real blockers any more. I suggest to get out > > 6.3.0 this week and proceed with change to 6.4.release_branch/7.0.svn. > > > > We can have 6.3.1 if needed. > > > > Sounds ok? > > to me, trac bug #72 is a blocker (PNG driver rendering offset) > http://trac.osgeo.org/grass/ticket/72 > > even spearfish fields map looks bad (vertical slivers) when displayed in > the GUI.
given the answer by Glynn: http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/grass-dev/2008-April/037267.html do you want to keep your veto? I fear that we never go ahead like this. > As promised, I will work on rewriting the release announcement in the > next day or two. > > > other lower priority things todo: > > > http://trac.osgeo.org/grass/query?status=new&status=assigned&status=reopened&milestone=6.3.0 OK, low priority, so we can do it in 6.3.1. It's a *technology preview*, nothing else what we want to publish now. Bugfree software of this size does not exist. > http://grass.osgeo.org/wiki/GRASS_6.3_Feature_Plan#6.3.0_final Can you revise your opinion? Markus _______________________________________________ grass-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
