To avoid a mess, we'll do 6.3.0.1 after - backport of Makefile fix (done) - backport of missing scripts as needed for Windows native (todo)
Thanks to Martin for the 6.3.0.1 idea. Markus On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 6:29 PM, Markus Neteler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > hi, > > > > On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 6:20 PM, Martin Landa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > 2008/4/21, Glynn Clements <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > Note: most of the imagery modules are missing in 6.3.0. > > > > > > The reason is that changes to the way that SUBDIRS was handled in > > > imagery/Makefile resulted in most of the modules not being built. The > > > specific change in question is r30999. > > > > > > Essentially, only the modules listed in $(FFTWBASED) and $(XMONBASED) > > > are actually built (assuming that FFTW and X11 respectively are > > > enabled). The modules which are supposed to be built unconditionally > > > are actually never built. > > > > > > I have just committed a fix to the trunk (r31065), but all of the > > > 6.3.0 binary packages which people have built will be missing the > > > following modules: > > > > > > i.ask > > > i.atcorr > > > i.cluster > > > i.find > > > i.gensig > > > i.gensigset > > > i.group > > > i.his.rgb > > > i.maxlik > > > i.rectify > > > i.rgb.his > > > i.smap > > > i.target > > > i.pca > > > i.cca > > > > > > > very bad news after tagging 6.3.0, better to discover now then later, > > thanks Glynn! I have backported fixed Makefile to releasebranch_6_3. I > > am afraid we need to tag 6.3.0 again(?) > > *Can* we redo 6.3.0? Or go directly for 6.3.1? > > Markus > -- Open Source Geospatial Foundation http://www.osgeo.org/ http://www.grassbook.org/ _______________________________________________ grass-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
