On Thu, 24 Apr 2008, Markus Neteler wrote:
On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 12:11 PM, Paul Kelly
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello everyone,
Updating from SVN this morning I see that the version number is now 6.4.svn
- I'm not sure if that's right? I thought it should be 6.3.svn until a
release branch for 6.4 is created, and the version number on that branch
will be 6.4.svn. At that point the version on develbranch_6, which will be
in operation by then, will become 6.5.svn (although there might not ever be
any 6.5 releases, similar to 5.5).
It is all a bit confusing though since we've started partially abandoning
the odd-development/stable-release system.
that's not intended.
Oh; I understood that it was. See:
http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/grass-dev/2007-August/032687.html
and
http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/grass-dev/2007-August/032705.html
Nobody else replied there apart from Glynn and I but I took that as
meaning there was agreement, on what has become a complicated subject!
Obviously, trunk needs to be changes to 7.0.svn.
We should fork the 6.4 now, called "develbranch_6". From that,
in future, "releasebranch_6_4" will be forked.
I just don't understand why the change to 6.4 numbering now - I thought
there might have been more 6.3 versions before we create the release
branch.
I vote for doing it now.
If you're talking about creating develbranch_6 and making the version
number in the trunk 7.0.svn, I'm in agreement with that too.
Paul
_______________________________________________
grass-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
