Hi, sorry for joining this discussion late, I was away all last week, but will now be available for support via email.
First of all, congrats on being accepted to the GSoC! Second, I agree that users need to be able to have two distinct modules, otherwise they will wonder where to find their stuff. One alternative you might want to consider is creating two separate binaries v.voronoi and v.delaunay using two Makefile targets that share exactly the same code base. You could then simply use argv[0] to check which one the user called and use appropriate program logics to set up GRASS options and parameters etc. Best, Benjamin ----- Original Message ----- From: "Martin Pavlovsky" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Paul Kelly" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: "Wolf Bergenheim" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "GRASS developers list" <[email protected]> Sent: 26 April 2008 08:16:57 o'clock (GMT) Europe/London Subject: Re: [GRASS-dev] GSoC, reimplementation of modules v.voronoi and v.delaunay _______________________________________________ grass-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev ------ Files attached to this email may be in ISO 26300 format (OASIS Open Document Format). If you have difficulty opening them, please visit http://iso26300.info for more information. _______________________________________________ grass-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
