I think it¹s OK to release 6.3.0-3. I guess I don¹t think people will wonder where 1 and 2 went. You could put a little message in the README if you want.
Michael On 5/19/08 2:27 AM, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi all, > > I finished my work on the installer: now it is capable to recognize if and > what version of GRASS is already installed on the system and tells the user if > he wants to upgrade to the newer version. > Now we need to decide the installer name. At the moment it is: > > WinGRASS-SourceCodeRelese-BinaryRelease.exe > > where the BinaryRelease number reflects only changes in the binaries (but not > in the GRASS sources used to build them) and/or the installer, starting from 1 > every time we have a new SourceCodeRelese. > > Since 6.3.0 has been released, I updated the installer once time, to fix the > bug #143 [1], so now we should be at the BinaryRelease N° 3 (1: the first > release, 2: the update to fix #143), but I always released the previous > intallers as 6.3.0, and not 6.3.0-1 and 6.3.0-2 (sorry, my fault). That means > that releasing 6.3.0-3 now might be confusing... > > what do you think about? > > Marco > > [1] http://trac.osgeo.org/grass/ticket/143 > __________________________________________ Michael Barton, Professor of Anthropology Director of Graduate Studies School of Human Evolution & Social Change Center for Social Dynamics & Complexity Arizona State University phone: 480-965-6213 fax: 480-965-7671 www: http://www.public.asu.edu/~cmbarton
_______________________________________________ grass-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
