Moritz Lennert wrote: > > Hamish: > >>>> Any thoughts on keeping the inter-branch svn merge > >>>> effort low? > > > > Glynn: > >>> Don't merge? > >>> > >>> Eventually, 7.x and 6.x are going to diverge by more > >>> than just formatting. > > > > but forking isn't a very nice solution.
Nice or not, it's inevitable. > Could you elaborate on why you fear forking here ? We are planning a > quite radical revamp of the code, so by definition the versions will be > incompatible at one stage. But I wouldn't call this "forking" ? It isn't "forking" insofar as 6.x is nearing the end of its lifespan. It's normally only considered a fork if both versions will persist indefinitely. -- Glynn Clements <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> _______________________________________________ grass-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
