On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 4:22 AM, Colin Nielsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Dylan, > Excellently documented example by the way.
Thanks! > The path is probably quite similar but the point is that there is > currently no way to ensure that the r.drain path conforms to the same > path as the optimal path of cost accumulation (calculated by r.walk or > r.cost). I see. I didn't quite understand your original post apparently. I would be happy to help try out any modifications to r.walk/r.drain. > Specifically I can't comment on your example yet because I haven't > completed my changes to r.drain. When I do (assuming I remember) I > will be glad to re-run your analysis to see what difference is > present. > > -Colin Sounds good. Cheers, Dylan >>Interesting post Colin. Can you comment on the differences between >>r.drain and r.walk in this example [1], in light of your findings? >> >>1. http://casoilresource.lawr.ucdavis.edu/drupal/node/544 >> >> >>Cheers, >> >>Dylan >>_______________________________________________ >>grass-dev mailing list >>[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev > _______________________________________________ > grass-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev > _______________________________________________ grass-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
