Markus Neteler pisze:
On Sat, Jul 5, 2008 at 7:43 PM, Maciej Sieczka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Would it hurt if I chenged the module's options descriptions to
comply with GRASS lingo (eg. "raster map" instead of "file" etc.).
In both 6.4.svn and trunk it is now: i.rectify [-ca] [input=name]
extension=string order=value [--verbose]
Standardization we should do in GRASS 7
http://grass.osgeo.org/wiki/GRASS_7_ideas_collection#Parameters_standardization
I do not mean to change *options names* of course! I was going to change
their *descriptions*, eg.:
1. "Name of the imagery group" -> "Input imagery group name" (to make it
clear i's the input)
2. "Output file extension" -> "Output raster maps extension" (term
"file" is ambigious in GRASS).
Is this acceptable?
--
Maciej Sieczka
www.sieczka.org
_______________________________________________
grass-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
