Markus Neteler wrote:
It is important - please, if not too hard (I ported it from r.cva to r.los, wasn't so hard) add it. It makes a difference... I have an ongoing "batlle" with an ex colleague if we can see the sea from our mountain here or not, r.los and his algorithm do not agree. :)
Interesting, I remember putting that into r.cva years ago (I used the approximation in the paper I mailed about before), but never really had any time to test it very well (which is why I marked it as untested in the HTML page for r.cva). Does it produce plausible results with your data? Curious, Ben -- Benjamin Ducke Senior Applications Support and Development Officer Oxford Archaeological Unit Limited Janus House Osney Mead OX2 0ES Oxford, U.K. Tel: +44 (0)1865 263 800 (switchboard) Tel: +44 (0)1865 980 758 (direct) Fax :+44 (0)1865 793 496 [EMAIL PROTECTED] ------ Files attached to this email may be in ISO 26300 format (OASIS Open Document Format). If you have difficulty opening them, please visit http://iso26300.info for more information. _______________________________________________ grass-dev mailing list grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
