Michael Barton wrote: > > On Aug 12, 2008, at 9:00 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Martin Landa pisze: >>> Hi, >>> >>> 2008/8/12 Maciej Sieczka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >>> I am not sure which icon set should be default, anyway I am using >>> silk... Maybe we could vote? >>> >>> +1 for silk ;-) >> >> Needless to say me the same: +1 for silk. > > The GRASS icon set is specifically designed for GRASS functions. Some > of the silk icons clearly map on to GRASS functions, but others are > pretty enigmatic because they are not designed for GIS. > > I'm reluctant to make the generic silk set the default when there are > mismatches between icon and function. This makes GRASS more difficult > to learn for the uninitiated. > > Michael > >
As my voice in this discussion I made some http://www.szczepanek.pl/icons.grass/v.0.1/ new icons and compared them with both sets you are talking about. Silk icons are nicer from design point of view, but I agree with Michael - they are less intuitive. New icon set preparation must consider ongoing discussion on http://www.nabble.com/terminology-issues-in-grass7-to18875472.html terminology issues and I hope to complete it (with your help) by beginning of October. When do you plan to release GRASS 7? Q: Why "Add RGB raster layer" icon http://www.nabble.com/file/p18955972/channel-rgb.gif has three layers in both versions? We add just one layer. Still looking primitive for "map". I don't like my proposal in "Export map display" icon http://www.nabble.com/file/p18955972/file-save.png - too similar to grid. Robert -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/default-icon-set-in-wxGUI-tp18941740p18955972.html Sent from the Grass - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ grass-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
