Hello Glynn, It should be standard bit shift ">>", so as to push the binary bits of interest at the right side to be used for classification. I do not get those warnings, and it processes as expected. Anything special about your compilation/compiler maybe?
Yann 2008/10/24 Glynn Clements <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > i.modis.qc currently generates a number of warnings: > > qc250b.c:14: warning: statement with no effect > qc250c.c:20: warning: statement with no effect > qc250d.c:12: warning: statement with no effect > qc250e.c:12: warning: statement with no effect > qc250f.c:12: warning: statement with no effect > qc500c.c:22: warning: statement with no effect > qc500d.c:12: warning: statement with no effect > qc500e.c:12: warning: statement with no effect > > These all relate to code such as: > > qctemp >> 2; /*bits [2-3] become [0-1] */ > > Is this supposed to be: > > qctemp >>= 2; > or: > pixel >>= 2; > > instead? > > -- > Glynn Clements <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > -- Yann Chemin International Rice Research Institute Office: http://www.irri.org/gis Perso: http://www.freewebs.com/ychemin YiKingDo: http://yikingdo.unblog.fr/ _______________________________________________ grass-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
