On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 3:39 PM, Patton, Eric <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> AFAICT `g.proj -wf` doesn't include grid file, while `g.proj -jf` does. >>> So I think my "best use `g.proj -wf` in that case" might be wrong as it >>> drops the grid file, so really best to use: >>> >>> IN_PROJ="`g.proj -jf` +wktext" >>> >>> http://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/ticket/2638#comment:6 >>> http://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/changeset/15681 > >>Mhh, that's fairly bad. Perhaps we need a note on >>the g.proj and g.region manual pages? >> >>However. I feel that 'g.proj -jf' is a poor representation >>compared to 'g.proj -wf', at least it doesn't help to >>maintain metadata in a reasonable way. >> >>Markus > > Just so I understand the problem: g.proj fails to report nadgrids information > with the -wf whereas -jf does? Should I go ahead and update the page, or is > this > a relatively simple fix in the code?
I feel that using -wf will severly damage the metadata (but apparently ignores nadgrids information which is bad, too - if present). I didn't go through the entire story, so no suggestion from me. Markus _______________________________________________ grass-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
