Roberto Antolín wrote: > After your (all) messages I searched for some information > about subprocess.* and saw that os.spawn* were replaced by > them. > > Thank you for pointing me this! It confirms my doubts. In > fact, subprocess.* are currently being used in grass.py > library, aren't they? Using subprocess.* will give some > kind of homogeneity.
I was about to suggest that the wiki Python page be checked, but "GRASS-Wiki has a problem" :( (hopefully temporary). Hamish _______________________________________________ grass-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
