Hamish wrote: > re. r34409: Replace r.buffer with a script using r.grow.distance > > I am wondering, does r.grow.distance do the right thing in Lat/Lon?
No. I'll look into adding metric=geodesic, but I'm not entirely certain that it's compatible with the algorithm. > If not, then the C version of r.buffer still has an important advantage > and should stay. For now, I'll re-enable it, renamed to r.buffer2. It shouldn't be the default, as it reads the entire map into memory. -- Glynn Clements <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> _______________________________________________ grass-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
