On Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 1:43 AM, Glynn Clements <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > And presumably the clean-up I've done on watershed in 7.0 has all now > been discarded?
No - since I didn't *replace* the old version. > If you're going to make "improvements" to a module, and you absolutely > must do so in private, outside of the SVN repository, at least make > the effort to merge in other people's changes instead of just throwing > them away. Well, I disactivated the existing code in the Makefile and didn't remove any of your changes. I also consider(ed) GRASS 7.svn to be under development where things may be temporarily in a "fluent" state. In generally I agree, in an ideal world with all being ideal developers in such a project only perfect code flows in. Unfortunately I don't meet these requirements. Apologies if I upset you - will concentrate on GRASS 6 for now. Markus _______________________________________________ grass-dev mailing list grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
