On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 3:44 PM, Helena Mitasova <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Dec 1, 2008, at 9:42 AM, Paul Kelly wrote: >> On Mon, 1 Dec 2008, Martin Landa wrote: >>> I also added to the list nviz_cmd module. I am not sure about its >>> name. Any ideas? >>> >>> nviz.cmd >> >> What about reviving the d.3d name? Or something that makes the >> functionality more obvious than nviz.cmd? I kind of think it should be a >> d.* command because it is really a display command, although different >> from most of the others... > > calling it d.3d sounds like a good idea (also close to the original sg3d)
I like that, too. And command name convention would be also back. Markus _______________________________________________ grass-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
