On Jan 31, 2009, at 8:27 AM, <[email protected]> wrote:
Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2009 16:27:35 +0100
From: Martin Landa <[email protected]>
Subject: [GRASS-dev] Re: subgroups in grass7
To: GRASS developers list <[email protected]>
Message-ID:
<[email protected]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Hi,
2009/1/10 Martin Landa <[email protected]>:
while reading
http://trac.osgeo.org/grass/ticket/134
Do we really need subgroups in G7? It would simplify usage of many
modules. E.g. I don't understand why I need to define subgroup for
i.maxlik.
Thanks for clarification.
so should I understand that subgroups are not really used in GRASS?
Another question - I would suggest to generalize i.group to g.group -
module which can group raster or vector layers into groups. This would
require to move group-related subroutines from imagery to gis library.
Then some v.* modules could accept vector layers group - e.g.
v.transform.
I second this latter idea. I also just had a report that the 'v.group'
hack that is needed by the georectifier module is now broken in 6.5
(and 6.4?) for wxPython. It is still working OK in TclTk.
Michael
_______________________________________________
grass-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
