Here are some Mac tests, below...
On Feb 8, 2009, at 12:45 PM, <[email protected]> wrote:
Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2009 20:24:21 +0100
From: Markus Neteler <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [GRASS-dev] r.surf.contour inefficiency?
To: Glynn Clements <[email protected]>
Cc: grass-dev <[email protected]>
Message-ID:
<[email protected]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
On Sun, Feb 8, 2009 at 5:25 PM, Glynn Clements <[email protected]
> wrote:
Markus Neteler wrote:
I'll remove the segmentation code in 7.0.
Here the timing comparison:
# NC data set
g.region vect=elev_lid792_cont1m res=1 -p
v.to.rast elev_lid792_cont1m out=elev_lid792_cont1m use=z
time r.surf.contour elev_lid792_cont1m out=dem
Results:
* GRASS 6.5.svn (pre seg size update):
147.66user
24.14system
2:52.22elapsed
184inputs+4544outputs (1major+508minor) pagefaults 0swaps
GRASS 6.5.svn (nc_spm_07):~ > time r.surf.contour elev_lid792_cont1m
out=dem --overwrite
100%
real 3m43.817s
user 2m0.088s
sys 1m42.810s
* GRASS 6.5.svn (post seg size update):
118.28user
0.26system
1:58.93elapsed
0inputs+4984outputs (0major+1202minor)pagefaults 0swaps
GRASS 6.5.svn (nc_spm_07):~ > time r.surf.contour elev_lid792_cont1m
out=dem
100%
real 1m6.448s
user 1m5.809s
sys 0m0.242s
* GRASS 7.svn:
72.19user
0.04system
1:12.38elapsed
0inputs+320outputs (0major+1023minor) pagefaults 0swaps
GRASS 7.0.svn (nc_spm_07):~ > time r.surf.contour elev_lid792_cont1m
out=dem --overwrite
100%
real 0m43.900s
user 0m43.574s
sys 0m0.148s
Michael
_______________________________________________
grass-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
