On Feb 19, 2009, at 3:50 AM, <[email protected]> wrote:
Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 11:50:02 +0100
From: Markus Neteler <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [GRASS-dev] [GRASS GIS] #498: r.sun2 out of sync / broken
svn history
To: GRASS developers list <[email protected]>
Message-ID:
<[email protected]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 5:04 AM, GRASS GIS <[email protected]> wrote:
#498: r.sun2 out of sync / broken svn history
attack of the out-of-sync clones & another "svn copy" related
tragedy.
(granted it was added to svn some months ago, when we were all
young about
these things)
Defense (Changelog analysis):
TOP-20 GRASS code contributors sorted by commits:
Name #commits percentage
markus 4756 24.77
bernhard 2487 12.95
hamish 2011 10.47
martinl 1607 8.37
glynn 1461 7.61
radim 1365 7.11
michael 724 3.77
cho 574 2.99
neteler 534 2.78
barton 478 2.49
brad 415 2.16
paul 279 1.45
landa 255 1.33
jachym 208 1.08
carlos 190 0.99
soeren 146 0.76
cepicky 126 0.66
cmbarton 125 0.65
cedric 125 0.65
helena 120 0.62
OK, take out for me the initial commit in 1999 and
Bernhard's creation of a new CVS repository some
years later. Still the order remains.
Now you can calculate the signal to noise ratio :)
I admit to not be a SVN guru, ready to learn.
Well, back to tech-talk:
should we create a diff to r.sun, delete r.sun2
from SVN, svn copy r.sun to r.sun2 and apply the
diff to carry over the history?
Markus
Even worse. Due to changes in user names, you're in there twice, as
are Martin and Jachym, and I'm in the list 3 times. So the list is
even shorter by 5.
Michael
_______________________________________________
grass-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
