> Martin wrote:
> > I would suggest splitting grass.py into several modules,
Glynn wrote:
> This would be a good point to consider how it relates to
> the SWIG interface.
....
> Or should we make them equal and just have grass.script.vector
> and grass.swig.vector?
>
> And should "swig" even be visible, or should it be e.g.
> "grass.lib.vector"?
very nice ideas guys.
grass.lib.vector and grass.script.vector sound good.
(possibly use a more descriptive name for 'script'?)
Hamish
_______________________________________________
grass-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
