Markus Neteler wrote:

> should we backport also
> http://trac.osgeo.org/grass/changeset/37068
> http://trac.osgeo.org/grass/changeset/37070
> http://trac.osgeo.org/grass/changeset/37071
> for winGRASS 6?

> http://trac.osgeo.org/grass/changeset/37068

Not relevant; the change relates to Python, and 6.x doesn't have the
Python scripts.

> http://trac.osgeo.org/grass/changeset/37070

Not relevant; 6.x doesn't have a separate functions.sh.

> http://trac.osgeo.org/grass/changeset/37071

Should probably be backported.

-- 
Glynn Clements <[email protected]>
_______________________________________________
grass-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev

Reply via email to