Markus M wrote:
> I know it's not a good idea at this stage of the discussion to
> come up with yet another word to replace layer,
sure why not. might as well be now..
> but how about subset? Because by choosing a vector "layer" you
> effectively select a subset of geometry objects in the vector map
> layer ;-), optionally linked to an attribute table specific
> for this subset. You would then display or process everything in
> a vector map or just a vector map subset (keeping in mind that a subset
> may contain all geometry objects present in a vector).
it's a real word, which is a major plus.
other ideas coming from that way of thinking:
groupings,
collections,
classes, / classing
or just go back to field numbers,
...
Hamish
_______________________________________________
grass-dev mailing list
grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
