Markus Metz wrote: > Maybe it is less effort and less complicated to make everything LFS-safe > instead of creating workarounds for modules that are not LFS-safe when > LFS is enabled for lib/gis? One way or the other, I guess these modules > need to be identified and possibly modified.
It certainly looks that way. It's basically a case of examining anything which uses lseek(), fseek() or ftell(), converting fseek/ftell to G_fseek/G_ftell respectively, and ensuring that offsets are calculated and stored using off_t. I *think* that I fixed all of the lseek() cases some time ago, but I didn't touch the fseek/ftell cases (we didn't have G_fseek/G_ftell at that time). -- Glynn Clements <[email protected]> _______________________________________________ grass-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
